.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Ultra-rapid versus conventional oocyte vitrification: a comparative study of clinical and molecular outcomes with single-cell transcriptomic insights
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
B
V
S
L
U
T
V
I
T
E
M
A
E
DOI：10.1093/humrep/deag094.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
By reducing the duration of the vitrification–warming procedure to 1 min does ultra-rapid vitrification–warming (URV/W) effectively maintain oocyte viability and improve clinical outcomes compared to conventional vitrification–warming (CV/W) timing (14 min) and what is the effect of the two procedures on cellular stress?
Journal
IF:
6.1
Papers:
1.5W
Citations:
3.5W
Organization
Cited Papers