返回
摘要
En 中文
AbstractIn order to discover the most rewarding actions, agents must collect information about their environment, potentially foregoing reward. The optimal solution to this “explore-exploit” dilemma is often computationally challenging, but principled algorithmic approximations exist. These approximations utilize uncertainty about action values in different ways. Somerandomexploration algorithms scale the level of choice stochasticity with the level of uncertainty. Otherdirectedexploration algorithms add a “bonus” to action values with high uncertainty. Random exploration algorithms are sensitive tototaluncertainty across actions, whereas directed exploration algorithms are sensitive torelativeuncertainty. This paper reports a multi-armed bandit experiment in which total and relative uncertainty were orthogonally manipulated. We found that humans employ both exploration strategies, and that these strategies are independently controlled by different uncertainty computations.
期刊
暂无期刊信息
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
暂无论文信息

