.png){kind=icon}
返回
Understanding algorithm aversion: When is advice from automation discounted?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1002/for.2464.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Forecasting advice from human advisors is often utilized more than advice from automation. There is little understanding of why algorithm aversion occurs, or specific conditions that may exaggerate it. This paper first reviews literature from two fieldsinterpersonal advice and human-automation trustthat can inform our understanding of the underlying causes of the phenomenon. Then, an experiment is conducted to search for these underlying causes. We do not replicate the finding that human advice is generally utilized more than automated advice. However, after receiving bad advice, utilization of automated advice decreased significantly more than advice from humans. We also find that decision makers describe themselves as having much more in common with human than automated advisors despite there being no interpersonal relationship in our study. Results are discussed in relation to other findings from the forecasting and human-automation trust fields and provide a new perspective on what causes and exaggerates algorithm aversion.
Keyword:
advice
algorithm aversion
automation
computers
trust
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
2.7
论文数:
2.3K
被引数:
3.0K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏
查看更多内容