.png){kind=icon}
返回
Understanding Environmental Cognition
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1177/1086026612456538.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Many research questions in environmental policy lead us to questions of environmental cognition-how do individuals structure their thinking about environmental issues, how are these cognitions learned, and how do they influence behaviors? Although these processes tend to be understudied and undertheorized, at least two theoretical perspectives are useful for illuminating different aspects of environmental cognition. The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) was developed in the political science literature to explain major policy change in technically complex issue areas, and the Values-Beliefs-Norms (VBN) theory was developed in the social psychology literature to explain environmental activism among the lay public. Unfortunately, these literatures rarely communicate with one another. This article shows how integrating key aspects of the ACF and VBN can moves us toward a more robust theory to guide future empirical work on cognition, learning, and behavior in the context of environmental issues.
Keyword:
environmental policy
cognition
belief systems
values
advocacy coalition framework
values-beliefs-norms theory
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
O
IF:
7.3
论文数:
842
被引数:
3.4K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏
Rainfall on wintering grounds affects population change in many species of Afro-Palaearctic migrants
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容