.png){kind=icon}
返回
UNDERSTANDING TRUST
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/ecoj.12036.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The World Values Survey (WVS) question on trust has been widely used to study the economic effect of trust. Recent work, however, questions its validity as an accurate measure of trust by showing that it is not correlated with the sender's behaviour in the Berg etal. trust game. What measure then should we trust to measure trust? In this article, we argue that the sender's behaviour in a trust game is driven both by beliefs and by preferences. In contrast, WVS-like measures capture mostly the belief-based component of a trust game.
Keyword:
SOCIAL PREFERENCES
RISK
RECIPROCITY
AVERSION
RULES
期刊
IF:
3.6
论文数:
5.5K
被引数:
1.6W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏
A Truth Serum for Non-Bayesians: Correcting Proper Scoring Rules for Risk Attitudes非贝叶斯主义的真相血清: 纠正风险态度的正确评分规则
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容