arrow
Return

Unique function words characterize genomic proteins

delete2018-06-12
delete5
delete
OA
AI
A
Andrea Scaiewicz
M
Michael Levitt *
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1801182115delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Between 2009 and 2016 the number of protein sequences from known species increased 10-fold from 8 million to 85 million. About 80% of these sequences contain at least one region recognized by the conserved domain architecture retrieval tool (CDART) as a sequence motif. Motifs provide clues to biological function but CDART often matches the same region of a protein by two or more profiles. Such synonyms complicate estimates of functional complexity. We do full-linkage clustering of redundant profiles by finding maximum disjoint cliques: Each cluster is replaced by a single representative profile to give what we term a unique function word (UFW). From 2009 to 2016, the number of sequence profiles used by CDART increased by 80%; the number of UFW5 increased more slowly by 30%, indicating that the number of UFW5 may be saturating. The number of sequences matched by a single UFW (sequences with single domain architectures) increased as slowly as the number of different words, whereas the number of sequences matched by a combination of two or more UFW5 in sequences with multiple domain architectures (MDAs) increased at the same rate as the total number of sequences. This combinatorial arrangement of a limited number of UFW5 in MDAs accounts for the genomic diversity of protein sequences. Although eukaryotes and prokaryotes use very similar sets of words or UFW5 (57% shared), the sentences (MDAs) are different (1.3% shared).
Keywords:
protein universe
genomic sequences
functional profiles
domain architecture
shared function
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

P
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IF:
9.1
Papers:
10.8W
Citations:
73.5W

Organization

S
Stanford University
Scholars:
9.6W
Papers: 8.2W
Citations: 17.0W