arrow
Return

Universal inference

delete2020-07-06
delete75
delete
OA
AI
L
Larry Wasserman *
A
Aaditya Ramdas
S
Sivaraman Balakrishnan
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1922664117delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
We propose a general method for constructing confidence sets and hypothesis tests that have finite-sample guarantees without regularity conditions. We refer to such procedures as univer-sal. The method is very simple and is based on a modified version of the usual likelihood-ratio statistic that we call the split likelihood-ratio test (split LRT) statistic. The (limiting) null distri-bution of the classical likelihood-ratio statistic is often intractable when used to test composite null hypotheses in irregular statis-tical models. Our method is especially appealing for statistical inference in these complex setups. The method we suggest works for any parametric model and also for some nonparametric mod-els, as long as computing a maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE) is feasible under the null. Canonical examples arise in mixture modeling and shape-constrained inference, for which construct-ing tests and confidence sets has been notoriously difficult. We also develop various extensions of our basic methods. We show that in settings when computing the MLE is hard, for the pur-pose of constructing valid tests and intervals, it is sufficient to upper bound the maximum likelihood. We investigate some con-ditions under which our methods yield valid inferences under model misspecification. Further, the split LRT can be used with profile likelihoods to deal with nuisance parameters, and it can also be run sequentially to yield anytime-valid P values and con-fidence sequences. Finally, when combined with the method of sieves, it can be used to perform model selection with nested model classes.
Keywords:
likelihood
testing
irregular models
confidence sequence
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

P
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IF:
9.1
Papers:
10.8W
Citations:
73.5W

Organization

C
Carnegie Mellon University
Scholars:
1.4W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 2.7W