.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Unpacking the Performativity of Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) Designation: Holding Universities Accountable and Developing a Call to Action
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
F
A
N
DOI：10.3390/socsci14100585.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Against the backdrop of historic and contemporary attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion, what could ethical accountability and a call to action look like in Hispanic Serving Institutions? There are only a handful of institutions in the nation to simultaneously hold the Carnegie distinction of very high research activity and the designation of Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI). Yet some of these institutions have historically provided little if any resources to support and retain Hispanic-identifying students, and when programs exist, they tend to be performative rather than substantive. We employ intersectionality as critical inquiry and praxis (action/reflection) to name and shed light on the various mechanisms that continue to marginalize Hispanic students. In this case study, we attempt to examine institutional administrative data to shine a light on the underrepresentation of Latine students and faculty within the institution. Instead, however, we describe the practice of institutional and statistical gaslighting we encountered while trying to obtain this data. We then utilize content analysis of archival documents of two university departments and combine these findings with autoethnographic data to highlight both the past and current state of Latine faculty hires. We further examine the lack of student services and the precarious funding situations of Hispanic-centered programs at the heart of Hispanic student success, and the impact of Presidential Executive orders prohibiting the use of federal funds to support these resources. Finally, we include steps that can lead to institutional transformation as an ethical imperative to serve all students.
Keywords:
Hispanic Serving Institutions
performativity
statistical gaslighting
institutional gatekeeping
institutional inequity
institutional accountability
ethics
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
S
IF:
1.7
Papers:
57
Citations:
5.7K
Organization
Cited Papers