.png){kind=icon}
返回
Untangling neural nets
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1017/S0003055404001200.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Beck, King, and Zeng (2000) offer both a sweeping critique of the quantitative security studies field and a bold new direction for future research. Despite important strengths in their work, we take issue with three aspects of their research: (1) the substance of the logit model they compare to their neural network, (2) the standards they use for assessing forecasts, and (3) the theoretical and model-building implications of the nonparametric approach represented by neural networks. We replicate and extend their analysis by estimating a more complete logit model and comparing it both to a neural network and to a linear discriminant analysis. Our work reveals that neural networks do not perform substantially better than either the logit or the linear discriminant estimators. Given this result, we argue that more traditional approaches should be relied upon due to their enhanced ability to test hypotheses.
Keyword:
DEMOCRATIC PEACE
WAR
FORECASTS
CONFLICT
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5.8
论文数:
8.7K
被引数:
2.1W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Ruthenium oxide-based nanocomposites with high specific surface area and improved capacitance as a supercapacitor具有高比表面积和改善的电容的氧化钌基纳米复合材料作为超级电容器.png)
RSC Adv.
RSC Adv.IF0
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容