.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Untitled Reply
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1080/17583004.2025.2484503.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Donald et al. (in press) misinterpret the central premise of the paper, incorrectly stating that we argue carbon credit claims [& mldr;] for increased sequestered carbon from early measurements are based on increases related to favourable climatic variations rather than improved land management. At no point in our paper do we make this claim. Instead, our analysis concluded that SOC stocks were primarily driven by rainfall, while also acknowledging the role of improved land management in SOC dynamics.
Keywords:
Carbon market
soil carbon
climate change mitigation
Journal
IF:
5.8
Papers:
460
Citations:
1.4K
View more organizations