arrow
返回

Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for blast wave predictions

delete2010-11-01
delete81
PRE
AI
O
Olav R. Hansen *
P
P. Hinze
D
Derek Engel
S
Scott G. Davis
DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2010.07.005delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Explosions will, in most cases, generate blast waves. While simple models (e.g., Multi Energy Method) are useful for simple explosion geometries, most practical explosions are far from trivial and require detailed analyses. For a reliable estimate of the blast from a gas explosion it is necessary to know the explosion strength. The source explosion may not be symmetric; the pressure waves will be reflected or deflected when hitting objects, or even worse, the blast waves may propagate inside buildings or tunnels with a very low rate of decay. The use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) explosion models for near and far field blast wave predictions has many advantages. These include more precise estimates of the energy and resulting pressure of the blast wave, as well as the ability to evaluate non-symmetrical effects caused by realistic geometries, gas cloud variations and ignition locations. This is essential when evaluating the likelihood of a given leak source as cause of an explosion or equally when evaluating the potential risk associated with a given leak source for a consequence analysis. In addition, unlike simple methods, CFD explosion models can also evaluate detailed dynamic effects in the near and far field, which include time dependent pressure loads as well as reflection and focusing of the blast waves. This is particularly valuable when assessing actual near-field blast damage during an explosion investigation or potential near-field damage during a risk analysis for a facility. One main challenge in applying CFD, however, is that these models require more information about the actual facility, including geometry details and process information. Collecting the necessary geometry and process data may be quite time consuming. This paper will show some blast prediction validation examples for the CFD model FLACS. It will also provide examples of how directional effects or interaction with objects can significantly influence the dynamics of the blast wave. Finally, the challenge of obtaining useful predictions with insufficient details regarding the geometry will also be addressed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
CFD-modeling
Gas explosion
Vapor cloud explosion
Blast waves
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 封面图
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
IF:
4.2
论文数:
4.6K
被引数:
1.1W

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

Implication of Active Oxygen Species as Second Messengers of Asbestos Toxicity
err2008-09-27
err0
PREAI
errBrooke T. Mossman; Joanne P. Marsh; Marie A. Shatos; Jacqueline Doherty; Rhonda Gilbert; Scot Hill
err分享
err收藏
Proteomic analysis of time-dependent changes in proteins expressed in mouse hippocampus during synaptic plasticity induced by GABAA receptor blockade
err2013-10-01
err0
PREAI
errKenji Matsuura; Tooru Nakamura-Hirota; Masaoki Takano; Mieko Otani; Keiichi Kadoyama; Shogo Matsuyama
err分享
err收藏
Oscillatory Dynamics Supporting Semantic Cognition: MEG Evidence for the Contribution of the Anterior Temporal Lobe Hub and Modality-Specific Spokes
err2017-01-11
err0
errOAAI
errGiovanna Mollo; Piers L. Cornelissen; Rebecca E. Millman; Andrew W. Ellis; Elizabeth Jefferies
err分享
err收藏
没有更多内容