.png){kind=icon}
返回
Using informed consent to save trust
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1136/medethics-2012-100490.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Increasingly, bioethicists defend informed consent as a safeguard for trust in caretakers and medical institutions. This paper discusses an 'ideal type' of that move. What I call the trust-promotion argument for informed consent states: 1. Social trust, especially trust in caretakers and medical institutions, is necessary so that, for example, people seek medical advice, comply with it, and participate in medical research. 2. Therefore, it is usually wrong to jeopardise that trust. 3. Coercion, deception, manipulation and other violations of standard informed consent requirements seriously jeopardise that trust. 4. Thus, standard informed consent requirements are justified. This article describes the initial promise of this argument, then identifies challenges to it. As I show, the value of trust fails to account for some commonsense intuitions about informed consent. We should revise the argument, commonsense morality, or both.
Keyword:
AFRICAN-AMERICANS VIEWS
ATTITUDES
DONATION
RACE
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.4
论文数:
7.0K
被引数:
6.4K
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容