arrow
返回

Using language models to improve opinion detection

delete2018-11-01
delete8
delete
OA
AI
M
Mohand Boughanem
DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2018.07.001delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Opinion mining is one of the most important research tasks in the information retrieval research community. With the huge volume of opinionated data available on the Web, approaches must be developed to differentiate opinion from fact. In this paper, we present a lexicon-based approach for opinion retrieval. Generally, opinion retrieval consists of two stages: relevance to the query and opinion detection. In our work, we focus on the second state which itself focusses on detecting opinionated documents. We compare the document to be analyzed with opinionated sources that contain subjective information. We hypothesize that a document with a strong similarity to opinionated sources is more likely to be opinionated itself. Typical lexicon-based approaches treat and choose their opinion sources according to their test collection, then calculate the opinion score based on the frequency of subjective terms in the document. In our work, we use different open opinion collections without any specific treatment and consider them as a reference collection. We then use language models to determine opinion scores. The analysis document and reference collection are represented by different language models (i.e., Dirichlet, Jelinek-Mercer and two-stage models). These language models are generally used in information retrieval to represent the relationship between documents and queries. However, in our study, we modify these language models to represent opinionated documents. We carry out several experiments using Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) Blogs 06 as our analysis collection and Internet Movie Data Bases (IMDB), Multi-Perspective Question Answering (MPQA) and CHESLY as our reference collection. To improve opinion detection, we study the impact of using different language models to represent the document and reference collection alongside different combinations of opinion and retrieval scores. We then use this data to deduce the best opinion detection models. Using the best models, our approach improves on the best baseline of TREC Blog (baseline4) by 30%.
Keyword:
Information retrieval
Opinion detection
Blog
Language model
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

I
Information Processing and Management
IF:
6.9
论文数:
5.2K
被引数:
1.4W

机构

U
universite toulouse iii - paul sabatier
学者数:
1.8W
论文数: 1.3W
被引数: 23
U
universite de toulouse
学者数:
3.5W
论文数: 2.7W
被引数: 37
引用论文

引用论文

The influence of global governance on the sustainable performance of countries
err2023-09-08
err0
PREAI
errFlavia Massuga; Marcos Aurélio Larson; Marcos Roberto Kuhl; Sérgio Luis Dias Doliveira
err分享
err收藏
A study on MCIN model in intelligent clothing industry
err2017-06-12
err0
errOAAI
errYixuan Nan; Yi Liu; Jianping Shen; Yueting Chai
err分享
err收藏
Sentimental Spidering: Leveraging Opinion Information in Focused Crawlers
err2012-11-01
err36
PREAI
errFu, Tianjun; Abbasi, Ahmed; Zeng, Daniel; Chen, Hsinchun
err分享
err收藏
A retrieved context model of the emotional modulation of memory
err
IF0
err2017-08-14
err0
errOAAI
errDeborah Talmi; Lynn J. Lohnas; Nathaniel D. Daw
err分享
err收藏
A survey on sentiment detection of reviews
err2009-09-01
err276
PREAI
errTang, Huifeng; Tan, Songbo; Cheng, Xueqi
err分享
err收藏
Genetic variation of 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II in three racial/ethnic groups: Implications for prostate cancer risk
err1997-09-15
err0
PREAI
errSunita A. Devgan; Brian E. Henderson; Mimi C. Yu; Chen-Yang Shi; Malcolm C. Pike; Ronald K. Ross; Juergen K.V. Reichardt
err分享
err收藏
Cavernous angiomas of the spinal cord
err1988-01-01
err0
PREAI
errG. Rees Cosgrove; Gilles Bertrand; Suzanne Fontaine; Yves Robitaille; Denis Melanson
err分享
err收藏
Effects of the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus in patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular cancer
err2008-02-29
err0
PREAI
errMagnus Rizell; Mats Andersson; Christian Cahlin; Larsolof Hafström; Michael Olausson; Per Lindnér
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
没有更多内容