.png){kind=icon}
返回
Using learning styles to evaluate computer-based instruction
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.011.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This study compared two instruments while evaluating the effects of learning style on performance when using a computer-based instruction (CBI) system to teach introductory probability and statistics. The Gregorc Style Delineator (GSD) and the Kolb Learning Style Inventory (LSI) were used to measure learning style. Results indicated that there was an effect of learning style when using the GSD: students identified as Concrete Sequential learned significantly less than students identified as Concrete Random. There was no effect according to LSI styles. Lack of an ordering preference dimension in the LSI is discussed as a possible explanation. Findings from other studies evaluating CBI and recommendations are also discussed. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
learning style
computer-based instruction
online instruction
human computer interaction
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
8.9
论文数:
9.0K
被引数:
5.8W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Energy calculation of a permanent magnet system by surface and flux integrals (the flux-mmf method)
PREAI
分享收藏INTRODUCTION TO KNOWLEDGE SPACES - HOW TO BUILD, TEST, AND SEARCH THEM.png)
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEWIF5.8
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容