.png){kind=icon}
返回
Using meta-analyses for comparative effectiveness research
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.outlook.2012.04.004.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Comparative effectiveness research seeks to identify the most effective interventions for particular patient populations. Meta-analysis is an especially valuable form of comparative effectiveness research because it emphasizes the magnitude of intervention effects rather than relying on tests of statistical significance among primary studies. Overall effects can be calculated for diverse clinical and patient-centered variables to determine the outcome patterns. Moderator analyses compare intervention characteristics among primary studies by determining whether effect sizes vary among studies with different intervention characteristics. Intervention effectiveness can be linked to patient characteristics to provide evidence for patient-centered care. Moderator analyses often answer questions never posed by primary studies because neither multiple intervention characteristics nor populations are compared in single primary studies. Thus, meta-analyses provide unique contributions to knowledge. Although meta-analysis is a powerful comparative effectiveness strategy, methodological challenges and limitations in primary research must be acknowledged to interpret findings.
Keyword:
Comparative effectiveness research
Meta-analysis
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.7
论文数:
2.7K
被引数:
3.5K
机构
引用论文
Meta-analysis of the effects of respiratory rehabilitation programmes on exercise capacity in accordance with programme characteristics呼吸康复方案对运动能力影响的Meta分析
PREAI
分享收藏Who Can Respond to Treatment? Identifying Patient Characteristics Related to Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects.png)
MEDICAL CAREOAAI
MEDICAL CAREIF2.8
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容