.png){kind=icon}
返回
Using the centre-periphery framework to explore human-carnivore relations
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110125.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Living alongside carnivores can incur both costs and benefits on people's lifeways. While positive outcomes of carnivore presence can foster coexistence, negative relations with carnivores can trigger carnivores' killing and undermine their conservation. In response to this, conservation efforts increasingly focus on promoting positive human-carnivore relations, most often through improvements in the flow of economic benefits from carnivores to local communities. However, there is a question mark over the effectiveness and potential consequences of market-based instruments for carnivore conservation. To understand the opportunities and pitfalls of market -based instruments for carnivore conservation, we use a centre-periphery framework to compare human -carnivore relations in two pastoral systems with uneven market-based conservation efforts across Kenya. We conducted 230 semi-structured interviews on costs and benefits, mitigation strategies and self-reported pro-pensity to kill carnivores. Our study shows how different human-carnivore relations are enacted in areas with uneven market-based conservation efforts. We found that the extent to which benefits are attributed to alive carnivores is largely shaped by the existence of market-based conservation efforts in the area. Our results also document an openly self-reported propensity to kill carnivores in places where market-based conservation efforts are meagre at best. A more robust understanding of the effectiveness of market-based instruments for carnivore conservation is essential to sustain positive human-carnivore relations into the future.
Keyword:
Benefits
Carnivores
Centre-periphery framework
Conservation
Human-carnivore relations
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.4
论文数:
1.0W
被引数:
4.0W
机构
引用论文
Convergences and divergences between scientific and Indigenous and Local Knowledge contribute to inform carnivore conservation.png)
AMBIOOAAI
AMBIOIF5.1
OAAI分享收藏Avoiding negativity bias: Towards a positive psychology of human-wildlife relationshipsAMBIOOAAI
AMBIOIF5.1
OAAI分享收藏Prosocial behavior and incentives: Evidence from field experiments in rural Mexico and TanzaniaECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICSIF6.3
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容