Validating Unsupervised Machine Learning Techniques for Software Defect Prediction With Generic Metamorphic Testing

doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3494044

2024-01-01

Pak Yuen Patrick Chan *

Jacky Keung

DOI：10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3494044

原文链接

原文求助

摘要

En 中文

In the realm of software defect prediction, unsupervised models often step in when labelled datasets are scarce, despite facing the challenge of validating models without prior knowledge of data. Addressing this, we proposed a novel approach leveraging generic metamorphic testing to validate such models effectively, bypassing the need for expert-derived metamorphic relations. Our method identifies five categories of generic metamorphic relations, further divided into twenty-one individual generic metamorphic relations, all formulated through generic Data Mutation Operators. This framework enables us to generate follow-up datasets from the source datasets, training respective software defect prediction models. By comparing predictions between the source and follow-up software defect prediction models and identifying inconsistencies, we can assess the model's sensitivity to generic metamorphic relations as a form of validation. This approach was rigorously evaluated across twenty software defect prediction models, incorporating fourteen different machine learning algorithms and twenty high-dimensional public datasets. Remarkably, the robustness of our generic MT model was confirmed, showing substantial effectiveness in validating software defect prediction models, independent of whether they were supervised or unsupervised. Software defect prediction models, using Agglomerative clustering and Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise algorithms, did not violate any metamorphic relation, and nineteen software defect prediction models did not significantly violate the generic metamorphic relation Shrinkage and Expansion. Our findings suggest that employing generic metamorphic relations, especially Shrinkage and Expansion, can universally enhance the validation of defect prediction models. Furthermore, our model can be applied to continuously monitor software defect prediction models.

Keyword:

Software

Predictive models

Machine learning

Adaptation models

Testing

Data models

Machine learning algorithms

Numerical models

Feature extraction

Mathematical models

Clustering methods