返回
Variable selection when estimating effects in external target populations
DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae048.png)
摘要
En 中文
External validity is an important part of epidemiologic research. To validly estimate effects in specific external target populations using a chosen effect measure (ie, transport), some methods require that one account for all effect measure modifiers (EMMs). However, little is known about how including other variables that are not EMMs (ie, non-EMMs) in adjustment sets affects estimates. Using simulations, we evaluated how inclusion of non-EMMs affected estimation of the transported risk difference (RD) by assessing the impacts of covariates that (1) differ (or not) between the trial and the target, (2) are associated with the outcome (or not), and (3) modify the RD (or not). We assessed variation and bias when covariates with each possible combination of these factors were used to transport RDs using outcome modeling or inverse odds weighting. Inclusion of variables that differed in distribution between the populations but were non-EMMs reduced precision, regardless of whether they were associated with the outcome. However, non-EMMs associated with selection did not amplify bias resulting from omission of necessary EMMs. Including all variables associated with the outcome may result in unnecessarily imprecise estimates when estimating treatment effects in external target populations.
Keyword:
external validity
generalizability
transportability
standardization
odds weights
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.8
论文数:
10.0K
被引数:
3.7W
机构
引用论文
Study Designs for Extending Causal Inferences From a Randomized Trial to a Target Population将因果推论从随机试验扩展到目标人群的研究设计

