arrow
返回

Variations in Finite-difference Potential Fields

delete2021-07-02
delete25
delete
OA
AI
R
Ronald M. Caplan *
C
Cooper Downs
J
J. A. Linker
Z
Z. Mikić
DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/abfd2fdelete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
The potential field (PF) solution of the solar corona is a vital modeling tool for a wide range of applications, including minimum energy estimates, coronal magnetic field modeling, and empirical solar wind solutions. Given its popularity, it is important to understand how choices made in computing a PF may influence key properties of the solution. Here we study PF solutions for the global coronal magnetic field on 2012 June 13, computed with our high-performance finite-difference code POT3D. Solutions are analyzed for their global properties and locally around NOAA AR 11504, using the net open flux, open-field boundaries, total magnetic energy, and magnetic structure as metrics. We explore how PF solutions depend on (1) the data source, type, and processing of the inner boundary conditions; (2) the choice of the outer boundary condition height and type; and (3) the numerical resolution and spatial scale of information at the lower boundary. We discuss the various qualitative and quantitative differences that naturally arise by using different maps as input, and we illustrate how coronal morphology and open flux depend most strongly on the outer boundary condition. We also show how large-scale morphologies and the open magnetic flux are remarkably insensitive to model resolution, while the surface mapping and embedded magnetic complexity vary considerably. This establishes important context for past, current, and future applications of the PF for coronal and solar wind modeling.
Keyword:
MAGNETIC-FIELDS
SOLAR CORONA
MODEL
ENERGY
WIND
INTERPLANETARY
EVOLUTION
DYNAMICS

期刊

Astrophysical Journal 封面图
Astrophysical Journal
IF:
5.4
论文数:
8.3W
被引数:
32.0W

机构

P
predictive science inc.
学者数:
131
论文数: 155
被引数: 8
引用论文

引用论文

Differential Course-taking Hypothesis Revisited
err1983-01-01
err0
PREAI
errCamilla Persson Benbow; Julian C Stanley
err分享
err收藏
Use of a Comprehensive Panel of Biomarkers to Predict Response to a Fluorouracil–Oxaliplatin Regimen in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
err2011-03-30
err0
PREAI
errMaria J Lamas; Goretti Duran; Emilia Balboa; Beatriz Bernardez; Manuel Touris; Yolanda Vidal; Elena Gallardo; Rafael Lopez; Angel Carracedo; Francisco Barros
err分享
err收藏
A twisted flux rope model for coronal mass ejections and two-ribbon flares
err2000-01-20
err367
errOAAI
errAmari, T; Luciani, JF; Mikic, Z; Linker, J
err分享
err收藏
The coronal heating mechanism as identified by full-Sun visualizations
err2004-11-01
err129
errOAAI
errSchrijver, CJ; Sandman, AW; Aschwanden, MJ; DeRosa, ML
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Predicting the corona for the 21 August 2017 total solar eclipse
err2018-08-27
err105
PREAI
errMikic, Zoran; Downs, Cooper; Linker, Jon A.; Caplan, Ronald M.; Mackay, Duncan H.; Upton, Lisa A.; Riley, Pete; Lionello, Roberto; Torok, Tibor; Titov, Viacheslav S.; Wijaya, Janvier; Druckmueller, Miloslav; Pasachoff, Jay M.; Carlos, Wendy
err分享
err收藏
OBTAINING POTENTIAL FIELD SOLUTIONS WITH SPHERICAL HARMONICS AND FINITE DIFFERENCES
err2011-04-25
err91
errOAAI
errToth, Gabor; van der Holst, Bart; Huang, Zhenguang
err分享
err收藏
Updated survival analyses after prolonged follow‐up of the phase 2, multicenter CREST study of bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
err2008-10-22
err0
PREAI
errSundar Jagannath; Bart Barlogie; James R. Berenson; David S. Siegel; David Irwin; Paul G. Richardson; Ruben Niesvizky; Raymond Alexanian; Steven A. Limentani; Melissa Alsina; Dixie‐Lee Esseltine; Kenneth C. Anderson
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容