.png){kind=icon}
返回
Voting Technologies
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.053007.145205.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
A renewed, energetic interest in voting technologies erupted in political science following the 2000 presidential election. Spawned initially by the recount controversy in Florida, the literature has grown to consider the effects of voting technologies on the vote choice more generally. This literature has explained why localities have the voting technologies (lever machines, punch cards, etc.) they use. Although there are racial differences in the distribution of voting technologies used across localities, the strongest explanations for why local jurisdictions use particular technologies rest on legacies of past decisions. The bulk of the voting technology literature has focused on explaining how voting technologies influence residual votes, that is, blank, undervoted, and over-voted ballots. With the relative homogenization of voting technology since 2000, prospects for research that examines the effects of different machines on residual votes seem limited. However, opportunities exist to study the effect of voting machines historically, the effect of voting technologies on down-ballot rates, and the role of interest groups in affecting which voting technologies are made available to voters.
Keyword:
voting machines
residual votes
vote choice
ballot roll-off
election reform
期刊
IF:
9.5
论文数:
598
被引数:
7.4K
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
分享收藏Prediction of sound absorption based on specific airflow resistance and air permeability of textiles
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Identification of Autotoxic Compounds in Fibrous Roots of Rehmannia (Rehmannia glutinosa Libosch.).png)
PLoS ONEOAAI
PLoS ONEIF0
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容