.png){kind=icon}
返回
What Conservation Does
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.tree.2018.07.004.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
New agendas for conservation are regularly proposed based on the ground that existing strategies are overly pessimistic, restricted to biodiversity hotspots, and inappropriate to halt biodiversity loss. However, little empirical evidence supports such claims. Here we review the 12 971 papers published in the leading conservation journals during the last 15 years to assess what conservation actually does. Although conservation research is affected by specific bias, conservation is playing a major role in providing empirical evidence of human impacts on biodiversity. Encouraging biodiversity comebacks are also published and a wide range of conservation tools, beyond the development of protected areas in wilderness areas, are promoted. We argue that finding new routes to conservation is neither necessary nor sufficient to halt biodiversity loss.
Keyword:
MARINE BIODIVERSITY
BIOLOGY
SCIENCE
OCEANS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
T
IF:
17.3
论文数:
4.4K
被引数:
4.0W
机构
引用论文
Publication of marine conservation papers: Is conservation biology too dry?.png)
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
CONSERVATION BIOLOGYIF5.5
PREAI
分享收藏
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容