arrow
返回

What do Programmers Discuss about Deep Learning Frameworks

delete2020-04-24
delete59
PRE
AI
J
Junxiao Han
E
Emad Shihab
Z
Zhiyuan Wan
S
Shuiguang Deng *
X
Xin Xia
DOI:10.1007/s10664-020-09819-6delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Deep learning has gained tremendous traction from the developer and researcher communities. It plays an increasingly significant role in a number of application domains. Deep learning frameworks are proposed to help developers and researchers easily leverage deep learning technologies, and they attract a great number of discussions on popular platforms, i.e., Stack Overflow and GitHub. To understand and compare the insights from these two platforms, we mine the topics of interests from these two platforms. Specifically, we apply Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling techniques to derive the discussion topics related to three popular deep learning frameworks, namely, Tensorflow, PyTorch and Theano. Within each platform, we compare the topics across the three deep learning frameworks. Moreover, we make a comparison of topics between the two platforms. Our observations include 1) a wide range of topics that are discussed about the three deep learning frameworks on both platforms, and the most popular workflow stages are Model Training and Preliminary Preparation. 2) the topic distributions at the workflow level and topic category level on Tensorflow and PyTorch are always similar while the topic distribution pattern on Theano is quite different. In addition, the topic trends at the workflow level and topic category level of the three deep learning frameworks are quite different. 3) the topics at the workflow level show different trends across the two platforms. e.g., the trend of the Preliminary Preparation stage topic on Stack Overflow comes to be relatively stable after 2016, while the trend of it on GitHub shows a stronger upward trend after 2016. Besides, the Model Training stage topic still achieves the highest impact scores across two platforms. Based on the findings, we also discuss implications for practitioners and researchers.
Keyword:
Empirical study
Deep learning frameworks
Tensorflow
Pytorch
Theano
LDA topic model
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Empirical Software Engineering 封面图
Empirical Software Engineering
IF:
3.6
论文数:
2.0K
被引数:
5.3K

机构

M
Monash University
学者数:
5.4W
论文数: 5.4W
被引数: 79
C
concordia university - canada
学者数:
8.0K
论文数: 8.9K
被引数: 4
Z
zhejiang university
学者数:
17.7W
论文数: 12.1W
被引数: 152
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

Chronic myeloid leukemia in a patient with acquired immune deficiency syndrome: complete cytogenetic response with imatinib mesylate: report of a case and review of the literature
err2004-06-01
err0
PREAI
errApostolia-Maria Tsimberidou; Jorge Medina; Jorge Cortes; Adan Rios; Glisson Bonnie; Stefan Faderl; Hagop Kantarjian; Guillermo Garcia-Manero
err分享
err收藏
Disruption of a primary health care domestic violence and abuse service in two London boroughs: interrupted time series evaluation
err2020-06-22
err0
errOAAI
errJasmina Panovska-Griffiths; Alex Hardip Sohal; Peter Martin; Estela Barbosa Capelas; Medina Johnson; Annie Howell; Natalia V Lewis; Gene Feder; Chris Griffiths; Sandra Eldridge
err分享
err收藏
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition ChallengeImageNet大规模视觉识别挑战
err2015-04-11
err2.7W
PREAI
errRussakovsky, Olga; Deng, Jia; Su, Hao; Krause, Jonathan; Satheesh, Sanjeev; Ma, Sean; Huang, Zhiheng; Karpathy, Andrej; Khosla, Aditya; Bernstein, Michael; Berg, Alexander C.; Fei-Fei, Li
err分享
err收藏
Quantifying the Autophagy-Triggering Effects of Drugs in Cell Spheroids with Live Fluorescence Microscopy
err2014-04-28
err0
PREAI
errNariman Ansari; Stefanie Hardung; Katharina Hötte; Stefanie Rakel; Patrick Antonietti; Donat Kögel; Ernst H. K. Stelzer; Francesco Pampaloni
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容