.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
The term policy sciences refers both to a distinctive tradition within the policy movement and to the broader policy movement itself. While the generic use of this term is sure to persist, the community of policy scientists trained in the tradition founded by Harold Lasswell and Myres S. McDougal faces challenges to its sustainability as a distinctive tradition of the policy movement. To motivate open discussion and debate, this essay follows the logic of a problem-oriented analysis, and also includes personal reflections and anecdote, with the following objectives: It suggests that the policy sciences tradition faces challenges to its sustainability because of the simple arithmetic of generational turnover in university faculty. It explores six factors internal and external to the policy sciences community militating against sustainability. The essay then critiques three different roles the policy scientist might play in contemporary academia, and concludes with a discussion of alternatives that might enhance the sustainability of the policy sciences tradition, should sustainability indeed be a desired outcome.
期刊
IF:
3.7
论文数:
2.4K
被引数:
3.3K
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Not all gleason pattern 4 prostate cancers are created equal: A study of latent prostatic carcinomas in a cystoprostatectomy and autopsy series并非所有gleason模式4前列腺癌都是相同的: 膀胱前列腺切除术和尸检系列中潜在前列腺癌的研究.png)
The Prostate.png)
The ProstateIF0
PREAI
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容