What's wrong with risk matrices?

Cox, Louis Anthony (Tony), Jr.

doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x

What's wrong with risk matrices?

2008-04-16

622

PRE

AI

C

Cox, Louis Anthony (Tony), Jr. *

DOI：10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x

原文链接

原文求助

摘要

En 中文

Risk matrices-tables mapping frequency and severity ratings to corresponding risk priority levels-are popular in applications as diverse as terrorism risk analysis, highway construction project management, office building risk analysis, climate change risk management, and enterprise risk management (ERM). National and international standards (e.g., Military Standard 882C and AS/NZS 4360:1999) have stimulated adoption of risk matrices by many organizations and risk consultants. However, little research rigorously validates their performance in actually improving risk management decisions. This article examines some mathematical properties of risk matrices and shows that they have the following limitations. (a) Poor Resolution. Typical risk matrices can correctly and unambiguously compare only a small fraction (e.g., less than 10%) of randomly selected pairs of hazards. They can assign identical ratings to quantitatively very different risks (range compression). (b) Errors. Risk matrices can mistakenly assign higher qualitative ratings to quantitatively smaller risks. For risks with negatively correlated frequencies and severities, they can be worse than useless, leading to worse-than-random decisions. (c) Suboptimal Resource Allocation. Effective allocation of resources to risk-reducing countermeasures cannot be based on the categories provided by risk matrices. (d) Ambiguous Inputs and Outputs. Categorizations of severity cannot be made objectively for uncertain consequences. Inputs to risk matrices (e.g., frequency and severity categorizations) and resulting outputs (i.e., risk ratings) require subjective interpretation, and different users may obtain opposite ratings of the same quantitative risks. These limitations suggest that risk matrices should be used with caution, and only with careful explanations of embedded judgments.

Keyword:

AS/NZS 4360

decision analysis

enterprise risk management

Military Standard 882C

qualitative risk assessment

risk matrix

semiquantitative risk assessment

worse-than-useless information

What's wrong with risk matrices?

摘要

AI总结

期刊

机构

引用论文