返回
When Common Identities Decrease Trust: An Experimental Study of Partisan Women
DOI:10.1111/ajps.12366.png)
摘要
En 中文
How does sharing a common gender identity affect the relationship between Democratic and Republican women? Social psychological work suggests that common ingroup identities unite competing factions. After closely examining the conditions upon which the common ingroup identity model depends, I argue that opposing partisans who share the superordinate identity of being a woman will not reduce their intergroup biases. Instead, I predict that raising the salience of their gender will increase cross-party biases. I support my hypotheses with a nationally representative survey of 3,000 adult women and two survey experiments, each with over 1,000 adult women. These findings have direct implications for how women evaluate one another in contentious political settings and, more broadly, for our understanding of when we can and cannot rely upon common identities to bridge the partisan divide.
Keyword:
INTERGROUP COOPERATION
SUPERORDINATE GOALS
INTERPERSONAL-TRUST
ATTITUDES
BEHAVIOR
GENDER
POLITICS
FEMINISM
BELIEFS
BIAS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5.6
论文数:
2.7K
被引数:
1.6W
机构
引用论文
Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior身份与紧急干预: 社会群体成员和群体边界的包容性如何塑造帮助行为
Feminists or postfeminists? Young women's attitudes toward feminism and gender relations
GENDER & SOCIETY
IF3.4
The Politics of Interpersonal Trust and Reciprocity: An Experimental Approach
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR
IF3.3

