arrow
返回

When do efficiency and flexibility determine a firm's performance? A simulation study

delete2019-04-01
delete13
delete
OA
AI
F
Fred Phillips *
J
Jinwon Chang
Y
Yu-Shan Su
DOI:10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.003delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Purpose: Using general systems theory, we present a series of simulations that shed light on the viability of business strategies in stable and turbulent business environments. Special attention is given to the impact of efficiency versus flexibility on firm performance, and on what the simulations reveal concerning successful strategies in each environment and firm type. Design/methodology/approach: Large-scale Monte Carlo simulations based on Ashby's Requisite Variety principle. Findings: Efficiency and flexibility do not, in general, determine performance. However, certain strategies appear to be superior, and in turbulent business environments, efficiency and flexibility appear well correlated with firm performance. Research limitations/implications: Implications and limitations of the Law of Requisite Variety for strategic analysis are set forth. Limitations stem from the simplifications needed for quantitative analysis, and lack of explicit consideration of competitors' actions. Practical implications: The simulations' realism offers insights to strategists regarding the roles of efficiency and flexibility in firm performance. The quantitative approach provides unambiguous definitions for some terms used in strategy, sharpening concepts put forth by Ashby and by Ansoff. Originality/value: A back-to-basics, systems approach to the simulations, using the venerable and general requisite variety principle as its basis, ensures sound analysis and appeal to readers who may come to it from diverse traditions of strategy theory. The quantitative simulation tool is made available for other researchers to test and extend. (c) 2018 Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
Keyword:
Strategy
Requisite variety
Simulation
Efficiency
Nimble firm
Corporate slack
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Journal of Innovation and Knowledge 封面图
Journal of Innovation and Knowledge
IF:
15.5
论文数:
912
被引数:
6.4K

机构

Y
yuan ze university
学者数:
3.0K
论文数: 3.4K
被引数: 3
S
stony brook university
学者数:
1.4W
论文数: 1.0W
被引数: 20
S
state university of new york (suny) system
学者数:
6.5W
论文数: 5.8W
被引数: 65
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

THE MYOPIA OF LEARNING学习的近视
err1993-01-01
err5.2K
PREAI
errLEVINTHAL, DA; MARCH, JG
err分享
err收藏
CVBEM solution for De Saint-Venant orthotropic beams under coupled bending and torsion
err2014-08-24
err0
errOAAI
errGiorgio Barone; Antonina Pirrotta; Roberta Santoro
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容