.png){kind=icon}
返回
When Does Cotraining Work in Real Data?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1109/TKDE.2010.158.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Cotraining, a paradigm of semisupervised learning, is promised to alleviate effectively the shortage of labeled examples in supervised learning. The standard two-view cotraining requires the data set to be described by two views of features, and previous studies have shown that cotraining works well if the two views satisfy the sufficiency and independence assumptions. In practice, however, these two assumptions are often not known or ensured (even when the two views are given). More commonly, most supervised data sets are described by one set of attributes (one view). Thus, they need be split into two views in order to apply the standard two-view cotraining. In this paper, we first propose a novel approach to empirically verify the two assumptions of cotraining given two views. Then, we design several methods to split single view data sets into two views, in order to make cotraining work reliably well. Our empirical results show that, given a whole or a large labeled training set, our view verification and splitting methods are quite effective. Unfortunately, cotraining is called for precisely when the labeled training set is small. However, given small labeled training sets, we show that the two cotraining assumptions are difficult to verify, and view splitting is unreliable. Our conclusions for cotraining's effectiveness are mixed. If two views are given, and known to satisfy the two assumptions, cotraining works well. Otherwise, based on small labeled training sets, verifying the assumptions or splitting single view into two views are unreliable; thus, it is uncertain whether the standard cotraining would work or not.
Keyword:
Semisupervised learning
cotraining
sufficiency assumption
independence assumption
view splitting
single-view
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
10.4
论文数:
6.8K
被引数:
3.2W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Physiological and behavioral responses to corticotropin-releasing factor administration: is CRF a mediator of anxiety or stress responses?促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子的生理和行为反应: CRF是焦虑或应激反应的中介物吗？
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容