arrow
返回

When Old Constructivism Was New: Reflections on Classical Constructivism

delete2024-12-31
delete0
PRE
AI
M
Martha Finnemore *
A
Alexander Wendt
DOI:10.1017/S1537592724001464delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
New lines of theorizing in international relations don't appear very often. Realism proudly proclaims a lineage of 2,500-odd years. Liberalism, in its various forms, traces its roots back several centuries. The appearance and spread of constructivism in the 1990s thus invite explanation. In this essay we explore the construction of constructivism-both the conditions of possibility for intellectual change and the goals of scholars proposing it. Constructivism's success was both unexpected and, in some ways, unintended. Proponents of existing theories remained (and remain) confident in their own tools and early constructivists often had modest goals. Constructivism took off for at least two broad reasons. One was the intellectual landscape of the late 1980s and early 1990s. This was a period when IR theory in the United States had sharply narrowed its concerns, leaving mainstream scholarship on the back foot when the USSR collapsed, and the Cold War ended. The second set of reasons lay in the nature of the constructivist ideas, themselves. Intellectually, constructivist ideas had a plasticity and capaciousness that other IR theories did not. Theoretically, it is a social theory, not specific to IR, which made it useful for tackling a broad range of problems. Empirically, it was portable and open to political analysis at all levels and in all places. Methodologically, it was pluralistic; scholars can and have used diverse methods to explore its claims. In this situation, constructivist scholars, overwhelmingly young and untenured, worked hard to carve out a niche for themselves in the field. That these ideas caught on and became broadly popular has surprised us as much as anyone.
Keyword:
INTERNATIONAL-RELATIONS
EPISTEMIC COMMUNITIES
ONTOLOGICAL SECURITY
FINANCIAL CRISIS
WORLD-POLITICS
UNITED-STATES
POWER
IDENTITY
ANARCHY
NORMS

期刊

Perspectives on Politics 封面图
Perspectives on Politics
IF:
4.5
论文数:
6.0K
被引数:
4.5K

机构

U
University System of Ohio
学者数:
15.4W
论文数: 13.0W
被引数: 200
G
George Washington University
学者数:
1.6W
论文数: 1.4W
被引数: 1.7W
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息