.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
A common approach to comparing asset pricing models involves a competition in pricing test-asset returns. In contrast, we show that for models with traded factors, when the comparison is framed appropriately in terms of success in pricing both the test-asset and factor returns, the extent to which each model is able to price the factors in the other model is what matters for model comparison. Test assets are irrelevant based on several prominent criteria. For models with nontraded factors, test assets are relevant for model comparison insofar as they are needed to identify factor-mimicking portfolio returns.
Keyword:
ASSET PRICING-MODELS
MUTUAL FUND PERFORMANCE
DISCOUNT FACTOR MODELS
EXPECTED RETURNS
EXCESS RETURNS
CROSS-SECTION
TESTS
RISK
PORTFOLIO
EFFICIENCY
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5.4
论文数:
2.8K
被引数:
3.0W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
查看更多内容