arrow
返回

Which infrastructures for which forest function? Analyzing multifunctionality through the social-ecological system framework

delete2020-01-01
delete11
delete
OA
AI
M
Mojtaba Houballah *
T
Thomas Cordonnier
J
Jean‐Denis Mathias
DOI:10.5751/ES-11424-250122delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Landscapes are subject to ecological and socioeconomic forces of change that interact in complex ways. To cope with these changes, landscape planning of natural resource management integrates sociocultural, ecological, and economic considerations in an analytic and systemic way. In this regard, social-ecological system (SES) frameworks have been developed to help analyze key factors that drive the dynamics of such complex adaptive systems. For forests, multifunctional management, which also highlights the ecological and socioeconomic roles of forests for society, has become a central objective for several European countries (e.g., France, Italy, and Germany). However, further development of methods, tools, and conceptual approaches is needed to facilitate our understanding of the arrangements behind management practices that include complex human-environment interactions. This study adopts Ostrom's SES framework and Anderies' robustness framework to highlight how forestry institutions affect forest ecosystems, forest functions, and social arrangements. As an illustration, we apply both frameworks to the Quatre-Montagnes forest, located in the south-east of France, in which multifunctionality is a major objective of forest governance. We first apply the SES framework to construct an analysis of the Quatre-Montagnes forest, specifying the first-tier and second-tier variables. From this, we describe the importance of infrastructure-related variables in shaping the interactions between components of the SES. We then apply the robustness framework, developed by Anderies, because we believe this framework enables a better analysis of ecosystem functions for infrastructure governance than the SES framework, which provides a better descriptive capacity for the variables. We discuss insights, based on our infrastructure analysis, which can be used when establishing designs for efficient forest management with heavy infrastructure dependencies.
Keyword:
forest accessibility
forestry
infrastructures
multifunctionality
robustness theory
social-ecological systems
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Ecology and Society 封面图
Ecology and Society
IF:
3.2
论文数:
2.5K
被引数:
1.4W

机构

U
universite clermont auvergne (uca)
学者数:
1.1W
论文数: 7.8K
被引数: 11
I
INRAE
学者数:
4.3W
论文数: 3.1W
被引数: 105
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息