arrow
返回

Who Cares?

delete2019-06-27
delete35
delete
OA
AI
L
Lyles, Ward *
W
White, Stacey Swearingen
DOI:10.1080/01944363.2019.1612268delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Problem, research strategy, and findings: What should planners do when members of the public care loudly at them? Planning scholars have recently called for more attention to the emotional dimensions of our profession. In the context of reflecting on Arnstein's A Ladder of Citizen Participation, we identify the emotional paradox of public engagement. This paradox arises because our emotions often motivate us to plan so that all people in our communities can flourish rather than suffer, but our instincts, reinforced by our education, training, and professional norms, may lead us to try to control or avoid emotions altogether in the actual work of planning. Our research strategy involves critically analyzing the language of Arnstein's article for its emotional content. We systematically review contemporary sources of guidance and training for planners (including from the APA, the AICP, and the Planning Accreditation Board) to determine whether and how the emotional dimensions of planning are addressed. We synthesize insights on contending with emotion from the psychology and neuroscience literatures and also synthesize practice-oriented resources for leveraging emotional and social intelligence to overcome the emotional paradox. We find that Arnstein's article evocatively reveals the emotional paradox. Our review of the contemporary knowledge, training, and skills available from major planning organizations demonstrates contemporary pervasiveness of the paradox. Research from psychology and neuroscience demonstrates, from a basic scientific standpoint, that trying to maintain the paradox is impossible, which helps to explain common pitfalls that planners fall into when doing their work.Takeaway for practice: Planners should reflect deeply on how they engage emotions in their work and how their approach constrains and enables their effectiveness. Deepening emotional, social, and cultural intelligence holds considerable potential for meeting our field's aspirational goals of fostering more compassionate and inclusive communities.
Keyword:
Arnstein
compassion
emotion
participation
planning
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Journal of the American Planning Association 封面图
Journal of the American Planning Association
IF:
3.4
论文数:
2.4K
被引数:
5.5K

机构

U
University of Kansas
学者数:
1.9W
论文数: 1.7W
被引数: 8.1K
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
The Prospect of Compassionate Planning
err2017-10-16
err28
PREAI
errLyles, Ward; White, Stacey Swearingen; Lavelle, Brooke D.
err分享
err收藏
Validating margin status in lung wedge resection for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer
err2018-06-19
err0
PREAI
errNoriyoshi Sawabata; Akikazu Kawase; Nobumasa Takahashi; Takeshi Kawaguchi; Tetsukan Woo; Yuichi Saito; Satoshi Shiono; Noriyuki Matsutani
err分享
err收藏
A New Multiple Objective Cuckoo Search for University Course Timetabling Problem
err2016-11-10
err0
PREAI
errThatchai Thepphakorn; Pupong Pongcharoen; Srisatja Vitayasak
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容