arrow
返回

Who should administer energy-efficiency programs?

delete2005-05-01
delete27
delete
OA
AI
C
Carl Blumstein *
C
Charles Goldman
G
Galen Barbose
DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2003.11.006delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
The restructuring of the US electricity industry created a crisis for utility operated energy-efficiency programs. This paper briefly describes the reasons for the crisis and some of its consequences. Then the paper focuses on issues related to program administration and discusses the relative merits of entities-utilities, state agencies, and non-profit corporations-that might be administrators. Four criteria are developed for choosing among program administration options: compatibility with public policy goals, effectiveness of the incentive structure, ability to realize economies of scale and scope, and contribution to the development of an energy-efficiency infrastructure. We examine one region, the Pacific Northwest, and three states, New York, Vermont, and Connecticut, which have made successful transitions to new governance and/or administration structures. Attention is also given to California where large-scale energy-efficiency programs have continued to operate, despite the fact that many of the key governance/ administration issues remain unresolved. We observe that no single administrative structure for energy-efficiency programs has yet emerged in the US that is clearly superior to all of the other alternatives. We conclude that this is not likely to happen soon for three reasons. First, policy environments differ significantly among the states. Second, the structure and regulation of the electric utility industry differs among the regions of the US. Third, market transformation and resource acquisition, two program strategies that were once seen as alternatives, are increasingly coming to be seen as complements. Energy-efficiency programs going forward are likely to include elements of both strategies. But, the administrative arrangements that are best suited to support market transformation may be different from the arrangements that are best for resource acquisition. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
energy-efficiency
restructuring
administration
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Energy Policy 封面图
Energy Policy
IF:
9.2
论文数:
1.6W
被引数:
6.8W

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

OVERCOMING SOCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS TO ENERGY-CONSERVATION
errENERGY
IF9.4
err1980-04-01
err173
errOAAI
errBLUMSTEIN, C; KRIEG, B; SCHIPPER, L; YORK, C
err分享
err收藏
A theory-based approach to market transformation
err2000-02-01
err41
PREAI
errBlumstein, C; Goldstone, S; Lutzenhiser, L
err分享
err收藏
Association between fungal spore exposure in inner-city schools and asthma morbidity
err2019-06-01
err0
errOAAI
errSachin N. Baxi; William J. Sheehan; Joanne E. Sordillo; Michael L. Muilenberg; Christine A. Rogers; Jonathan M. Gaffin; Perdita Permaul; Peggy S. Lai; Margee Louisias; Carter R. Petty; Chunxia Fu; Diane R. Gold; Wanda Phipatanakul
err分享
err收藏
没有更多内容