arrow
返回

Why Different Water Models Predict Different Structures Under 2D Confinement

delete2018-09-18
delete29
delete
OA
AI
J
James A. Dix
L
Leo Lue
P
Paola Carbone *
DOI:10.1002/jcc.25369delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Experiments of nanoconfined water between graphene sheets at high pressure suggest that it forms a square ice structure (Algara-Siller et al., Nature, 2015, 519, 443). Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been used to attempt to recreate this structure, but there have been discrepancies in the structure formed by the confined water depending on the simulation set-up that was employed and particularly on the choice of water model. Here, using classical molecular dynamics simulations, we have systematically investigated the effect that three different water models (SPC/E, TIP4P/2005 and TIP5P) have on the structure of water confined between two rigid graphene sheets with a 0.9 nm separation. We show that the TIP4P/2005 and the TIP5P water models form a hexagonal AA-stacked structure, whereas the SPC/E model forms a rhombic AB-stacked structure. Our work demonstrates that the formation of these structures is driven by differences in the strength of hydrogen bonds predicted by the three water models, and that the nature of the graphene/water interaction only mildly affects the phase diagram. Considering the available experimental data and first-principle simulations we conclude that, among the models tested, the TIP4P/2005 and TIP5P force fields are for now the most reliable when simulating water under confinement. (C) 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keyword:
graphene
confinement
molecular dynamics
water
SPC/E
TIP4P/2005
TIP5P
hydrogen bond
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Journal of Computational Chemistry 封面图
Journal of Computational Chemistry
IF:
4.8
论文数:
7.1K
被引数:
6.1W

机构

U
university of strathclyde
学者数:
1.1W
论文数: 1.1W
被引数: 12
U
University of Manchester
学者数:
5.7W
论文数: 5.3W
被引数: 7.4W
引用论文

引用论文

Ecosystem services in European protected areas: Ambiguity in the views of scientists and managers?
err2017-11-15
err0
errOAAI
errChristiaan Hummel; Antonello Provenzale; Jaap van der Meer; Sander Wijnhoven; Arno Nolte; Dimitris Poursanidis; Guyonne Janss; Matthias Jurek; Magnus Andresen; Brigitte Poulin; Johannes Kobler; Carl Beierkuhnlein; João Honrado; Arturas Razinkovas; Ana Stritih; Tessa Bargmann; Alex Ziemba; Francisco Bonet-García; Mihai Cristian Adamescu; Gerard Janssen; Herman Hummel
err分享
err收藏
Van der Waals pressure and its effect on trapped interlayer molecules范德华压力及其对捕获的层间分子的影响
err2016-07-07
err162
errOAAI
errVasu, K. S.; Prestat, E.; Abraham, J.; Dix, J.; Kashtiban, R. J.; Beheshtian, J.; Sloan, J.; Carbone, P.; Neek-Amal, M.; Haigh, S. J.; Geim, A. K.; Nair, R. R.
err分享
err收藏
Monocular Vision Based SLAM for Mobile Robots
err2006-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errE. Mouragnon; M. Lhuillier; M. Dhome; F. Dekeyser; P. Sayd
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容