arrow
返回

Why polls fail to predict elections

delete2021-10-23
delete12
delete
OA
AI
Z
Zhenkun Zhou
M
Matteo Serafino
G
Guido Caldarelli
H
Hernán A. Makse *
DOI:10.1186/s40537-021-00525-8delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
In the past decade we have witnessed the failure of traditional polls in predicting presidential election outcomes across the world. To understand the reasons behind these failures we analyze the raw data of a trusted pollster which failed to predict, along with the rest of the pollsters, the surprising 2019 presidential election in Argentina. Analysis of the raw and re-weighted data from longitudinal surveys performed before and after the elections reveals clear biases related to mis-representation of the population and, most importantly, to social-desirability biases, i.e., the tendency of respondents to hide their intention to vote for controversial candidates. We propose an opinion tracking method based on machine learning models and big-data analytics from social networks that overcomes the limits of traditional polls. This method includes three prediction models based on the loyalty classes of users to candidates, homophily measures and re-weighting scenarios. The model achieves accurate results in the 2019 Argentina elections predicting the overwhelming victory of the candidate Alberto Fernandez over the incumbent president Mauricio Macri, while none of the traditional pollsters was able to predict the large gap between them. Beyond predicting political elections, the framework we propose is more general and can be used to discover trends in society, for instance, what people think about economics, education or climate change.
Keyword:
Election prediction
Social-desirability biases
Social networks
Big-data analytics
Opinion analysis
Machine learning
Natural language processing
Artificial Intelligence

期刊

Journal of Big Data 封面图
Journal of Big Data
IF:
6.4
论文数:
1.5K
被引数:
1.1W

机构

C
capital university of economics & business
学者数:
1.2K
论文数: 1.3K
被引数: 1
I
IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca
学者数:
676
论文数: 701
被引数: 693
U
Universita Ca Foscari Venezia
学者数:
3.4K
论文数: 3.2K
被引数: 6
C
consiglio nazionale delle ricerche (cnr)
学者数:
6.2W
论文数: 5.7W
被引数: 48
C
city university of new york (cuny) system
学者数:
1.6W
论文数: 1.5W
被引数: 26
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

Capillary blood flow
err1970-10-01
err0
PREAI
errR.M. Hochmuth; R.N. Marple; S.P. Sutera
err分享
err收藏
PREDICTION AND ITS LIMITS
errSCIENCE
IF45.8
err2017-02-03
err22
errOAAI
errJasny, Barbara R.; Stone, Richard
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Clinical Trials: Is ‘In-Trial’ Guidance Lacking? A Systematic Review
err2013-04-01
err0
errOAAI
errDerek G. Kyte; Heather Draper; Jonathan Ives; Clive Liles; Adrian Gheorghe; Melanie Calvert
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Social media and microtargeting: Political data processing and the consequences for Germany
err2018-11-20
err41
errOAAI
errPapakyriakopoulos, Orestis; Hegelich, Simon; Shahrezaye, Morteza; Serrano, Juan Carlos Medina
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Retroperitoneal fibrosis associated with stenolol.
errBMJ
IF0
err1980-03-22
err0
errOAAI
errJ N Johnson; J McFarland
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容