.png){kind=icon}
返回
Why quantum probability does not explain the conjunction fallacy
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1017/S0140525X12003123.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
We agree with Pothos & Busemeyer (P&B) that formal tools can be fruitfully employed to model human judgment under uncertainty, including well-known departures from principles of classical probability. However, existing findings either contradict P&B's quantum probability approach or support it to a limited extent. The conjunction fallacy serves as a key illustration of both kinds of problems.
Keyword:
CONFIRMATION
ERRORS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
13.7
论文数:
1.6W
被引数:
1.2W
机构
引用论文
The Diagnosis, Occurrence and Distribution of Sheep Pulmonary Adenomatosis in Scotland 1975 to 1981
PREAI
分享收藏
Effects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the hummingbird-pollinated plant Ipomopsis aggregata.png)
Oecologia
OecologiaIF0
PREAI
分享收藏 没有更多内容
没有更多内容