.png){kind=icon}
返回
Why use the microAKIS concept?
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1080/1389224X.2024.2402307.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This paper traces the conceptual bases of the recently introduced microAKIS concept with the aim of understanding its grounding within and critically discussing its added value for the broader AKIS concept.
The article is designed as a discussion paper, it builds upon all openly accessible articles in January 2024 that use the microAKIS concept. Through qualitative text analysis, the definition and essential features of this concept are presented and compared with the characteristics of the more established AKIS (and AIS) concept. The essential components of the system concept are used to support the analysis and evaluation of the former’s explanatory content.
The analysis suggests that the use of the concept does not generate an epistemological added value and thus does not enhance our analytical understanding of innovation situations or processes due to a deficit of explaining the relations or linkages within the microAKIS.
The consideration of the concept’s limited explanatory significance can help to make AKIS-related political and scientific discussions more precise and to avoid misunderstandings.
The findings question the relevance of the proposed micro-level system approach to knowledge acquisition and innovation processes at farm level.
The paper is original in that it opens up a scholarly discussion of concepts that rarely happens in journals these days. Its value lies in the fact that it addresses a perceived explanatory deficit and stimulates the explicit formulation of assumed cause–effect relations and linkages in social situations and processes.
Keyword:
Innovation process
microAKIS
discussion paper
systems approach
AKIS concept
期刊
J
IF:
2.6
论文数:
44
被引数:
1.2K
机构
引用论文
Kernecker, M., M. Busse, and A. Knierim. 2021. “Exploring Actors, Their Constellations, and Roles in Digital Agricultural Innovations.” Agricultural Systems 186:102952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102952. (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google ScholarKernecker, M., M. Busse, and A. Knierim. 2021. “探索数字农业创新中的行动者、其组合及角色。” 农业系统 186:102952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102952. (在新窗口中打开) Web of Science ®(在新窗口中打开) Google Scholar.png)
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏Sutherland, L. A., and P. Labarthe. 2022b. “Should ‘Impartial’ Advice be a Priority of European Agricultural and Rural Policies?” EuroChoices 21:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12348. (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google ScholarSutherland, L. A.，和P. Labarthe. 2022b. “‘公正’建议是否应成为欧洲农业和农村政策的优先事项？” EuroChoices 21:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12348. (在新窗口中打开)Web of Science ®(在新窗口中打开)Google Scholar
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏Ison, R. 2016. “Governing in the Anthropocene: What Future Systems Thinking in Practice?” Systems Research and Behavioural Sciences 33 (5): 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2421. (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google ScholarIson, R. 2016. “治理人类世：实践中的未来系统思维？”《系统研究与行为科学》33 (5): 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2421. (在新窗口中打开)Web of Science ®(在新窗口中打开)谷歌学术
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏Moeyersons, M., and E. Mathijs. 2023. “The Importance of MicroAKIS Members in the Strategic Decisions of Flemish Horticulture Farmers.” Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2023.2255173. (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google ScholarMoeyersons, M., 和 E. Mathijs. 2023. “MicroAKIS 成员在弗拉芒园艺农民战略决策中的重要性。” 《农业教育与推广杂志》1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2023.2255173. (在新窗口打开) Web of Science ®(在新窗口打开) Google Scholar
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏Beers, P. J., and F. Geerling-Eiff. 2013. “Networks as Policy Instruments for Innovation.” The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 20:363–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2013.846870. (Open in a new window)Google ScholarBeers, P. J., and F. Geerling-Eiff. 2013. “Networks as Policy Instruments for Innovation.” 《农业教育与推广杂志》20:363–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2013.846870. (在新窗口中打开) Google Scholar
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏Triggering change: Towards a conceptualisation of major change processes in farm decision-making
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Application of an integrated systemic framework for analysing agricultural innovation systems and informing innovation policies: Comparing the Dutch and Scottish agrifood sectorsAGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMSIF6.1
PREAI
分享收藏Touzard, J. M., L. Temple, G. Faure, and B. Triomphe. 2015. “Innovation Systems and Knowledge Communities in the Agriculture and Agrifood Sector: A Literature Review.” Journal of Innovation Economics Management 2:117–142. (Open in a new window)Google ScholarTouzard, J. M., L. Temple, G. Faure, and B. Triomphe. 2015. “农业和食品行业中的创新系统与知识社区：文献综述。”《创新经济学与管理杂志》2:117–142. (在新窗口中打开)Google Scholar
IF0
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容