A conservatism index based on structural reliability and model errors

doi:10.1016/j.ress.2021.107456

Return

A conservatism index based on structural reliability and model errors

2021-05-01

PRE

Wellison José de Santana Gomes *

André T. Beck

DOI：10.1016/j.ress.2021.107456

Original

Original request for help

Save

Abstract

En 中文

Engineering models are known to be approximate representations of reality. When approximate models are employed in design, it is usually better when they are (slightly) conservative, rather than the contrary. Out of many recent publications addressing and discussing model uncertainty, we could not find any general method for classifying if a model is conservative, or not; and how conservative it is. In this paper, we propose a model conservatism index which is based on structural reliability theory and aims at quantifying the degree of conservatism of a given structural model. Computation of the proposed conservatism index requires the same data employed for computing model error statistics. The method can be employed to evaluate models used in structural design, and corrected models used in structural reliability analysis. The method is applied to several examples, involving different kinds of simplified models, and shown to accurately classify models as conservative/non-conservative. A simple practical case study is also presented, which includes a nonlinear finite element model, to show that the proposed index may be applied in real-world situations.

Keywords:

Structural reliability

Reliability analysis

Conservatism

Model error

Model uncertainty

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.