arrow
Return

A Cost-Effective Random Testing Method for Programs with Non-Numeric Inputs

delete2016-01-01
delete32
delete
OA
AI
A
Arlinta Barus *
T
Tsong Yueh Chen
F
Fei‐Ching Kuo
H
Huai Liu
R
Robert Merkel
G
Gregg Rothermel
DOI:10.1109/TC.2016.2547380delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Randomtesting (RT) has been widely used in the testing of various software and hardware systems. Adaptive random testing (ART) is a family of random testing techniques that aim to enhance the failure-detection effectiveness of RT by spreading random test cases evenly throughout the input domain. ART has been empirically shown to be effective on software with numeric inputs. However, there are two aspects of ART that need to be addressed to render its adoption more widespread-applicability to programs with non-numeric inputs, and the high computation overhead of many ART algorithms. We present a linear-order ART algorithm for software with non-numeric inputs. The key requirement for using ART with non-numeric inputs is an appropriate distance measure. We use the concepts of categories and choices from category-partition testing to formulate such a measure. We investigate the failure-detection effectiveness of our technique by performing an empirical study on 14 object programs, using two standard metrics-F-measure and P-measure. Our ART algorithm statistically significantly outperforms RT on 10 of the 14 programs studied, and exhibits performance similar to RT on three of the four remaining programs. The selection overhead of our ART algorithm is close to that of RT.
Keywords:
Random testing
adaptive random testing
category-partition method

Journal

IEEE Transactions on Computers cover
IEEE Transactions on Computers
IF:
3.8
Papers:
5.3K
Citations:
9.8K

Organization

M
Monash University
Scholars:
5.4W
Papers: 5.4W
Citations: 79
U
University of Nebraska Lincoln
Scholars:
7.8K
Papers: 6.5K
Citations: 2.0W
S
Swinburne University of Technology
Scholars:
9.3K
Papers: 1.2W
Citations: 2.0W
University of Nebraska System cover
University of Nebraska System
Scholars:
2.7W
Papers: 2.3W
Citations: 58
researcher View more organizations