arrow
Return

A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency

delete2010-07-08
delete317
PRE
AI
G
Gidi Ne’eman
A
Andreas Jürgens
L
Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd
S
Simon G. Potts
A
Amots Dafni *
DOI:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00108.xdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Measuring pollinator performance has become increasingly important with emerging needs for risk assessment in conservation and sustainable agriculture that require multi-year and multi-site comparisons across studies. However, comparing pollinator performance across studies is difficult because of the diversity of concepts and disparate methods in use. Our review of the literature shows many unresolved ambiguities. Two different assessment concepts predominate: the first estimates stigmatic pollen deposition and the underlying pollinator behaviour parameters, while the second estimates the pollinator's contribution to plant reproductive success, for example in terms of seed set. Both concepts include a number of parameters combined in diverse ways and named under a diversity of synonyms and homonyms. However, these concepts are overlapping because pollen deposition success is the most frequently used proxy for assessing the pollinator's contribution to plant reproductive success. We analyse the diverse concepts and methods in the context of a new proposed conceptual framework with a modular approach based on pollen deposition, visit frequency, and contribution to seed set relative to the plant's maximum female reproductive potential. A system of equations is proposed to optimize the balance between idealised theoretical concepts and practical operational methods. Our framework permits comparisons over a range of floral phenotypes, and spatial and temporal scales, because scaling up is based on the same fundamental unit of analysis, the single visit.
Keywords:
pollen deposition
pollen quality
pollinator performance
pollinator effectiveness
pollination efficiency
seed set
visit frequency
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Biological Reviews cover
Biological Reviews
IF:
11.7
Papers:
1.8K
Citations:
2.2W

Organization

U
University of Haifa
Scholars:
5.9K
Papers: 6.1K
Citations: 6.4K
U
university of kwazulu natal
Scholars:
1.0W
Papers: 9.0K
Citations: 11
U
University of Reading
Scholars:
1.0W
Papers: 1.1W
Citations: 1.7W
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Smart correlation of compositional data to saturation pressure
err2015-01-01
err0
PREAI
errAmin Gholami; Mohammad Afshar; Parisa Bagheripour; Mojtaba Asoodeh; Mohsen Vaezzadeh-Asadi
errShare
errSave
Optimization of multi-refinery hydrogen networks
err2012-01-01
err0
PREAI
errAnoop Jagannath; Ali Elkamel; I.A. Karimi
errShare
errSave
Investigation of heterogeneous ratcheting of a GTAW welded joint for primary coolant piping
err2019-09-26
err0
PREAI
errWeiwei Yu; Hui Liu; Wenqing Jia; Minyu Fan; Jinhua Shi; Fei Xue; Xu Chen
errShare
errSave
Multifocal musculoskeletal tuberculosis in children: appearances on computed tomography
err2001-11-09
err0
PREAI
errB. Morris; R. Varma; A. Garg; M. Awasthi; M. Maheshwari
errShare
errSave
researcher View more