arrow
Return

A framework for multi-objective facility layout design

delete2015-12-01
delete52
PRE
AI
A
Ashish Saraswat
U
Uday Venkatadri
I
Ignacio Castillo *
DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2015.09.006delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The most commonly used metric for facility layout design in the academic literature is the flow-distance metric, a weighted average between the material transfer and the distance travelled. Researchers and practitioners, however, have recognized that other metrics are also important. Facility layout designs obtained using the flow-distance metric exclusively have been criticized because they completely ignore empty material transfer, which generally increases work-in-process and equipment costs. Therefore, facility layout design (block layout design in particular) based exclusively on the flow-distance metric is insufficient. In this paper, we present a framework that utilizes the recent advancements in the facility planning literature to generate block layout designs based on three objectives: flow-distance, average work-in-process, and the number of required material handling devices. Numerical experiments are conducted on a number of standard problems, and the tradeoffs between the different objectives are studied. Our study indicates that it is critical to pursue multi-objective analysis and optimization for the actual implementation of the layouts. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Multi-objective block layout problem
Average work-in-process
Sequence pair and epsilon-accurate model representation
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Computers and Industrial Engineering cover
Computers and Industrial Engineering
IF:
6.5
Papers:
1.0W
Citations:
3.8W

Organization

W
Wilfrid Laurier University
Scholars:
1.9K
Papers: 2.3K
Citations: 3.8K
D
Dalhousie University
Scholars:
2.0W
Papers: 1.8W
Citations: 2.3W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
researcher View more