arrow
Return

A generic framework for geotechnical subsurface modeling with machine learning

delete2022-10-01
delete16
delete
OA
AI
J
Jiawei Xie
J
Jinsong Huang *
C
Cheng Zeng
S
Shan Huang
G
Glen J. Burton
DOI:10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.08.001delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
This study introduces a generic framework for geotechnical subsurface modeling, which accounts for spatial autocorrelation with local mapping machine learning (ML) methods. Instead of using XY coordinate fields directly as model input, a series of autocorrelated geotechnical distance fields (GDFs) is designed to enable the ML models to infer the spatial relationship between the sampled locations and unknown locations. The whole framework using GDF with ML methods is named GDF-ML. This framework is purely data-driven which avoids the tedious work in the scale of fluctuations (SOFs) estimating and data detrending in the conventional spatial interpolation methods. Six local mapping ML methods (extra trees (ETs), gradient boosting (GB), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), general regression neural network (GRNN) and k-nearest neighbors (KNN)) are compared in the GDF-ML framework. The results show that the GDFs are better than the conventional XY coordinate fields based ML methods in both accuracy and spatial continuity. GDF-ML is flexible which can be applied to high-dimensional, multi-variable and incomplete datasets. Among these six methods, GDF with ET method (GDF-ET) clearly shows the best accuracy and best spatial continuity. The proposed GDF-ET method can provide a fast and accurate interpretation of the soil property profile. Sensitivity analysis shows that this method is applicable to very small training dataset size. The associated statistical uncertainty can also be quantified so that the reliability of the subsurface modeling results can be estimated objectively and explicitly. The uncertainty results clearly show that the prediction becomes more accurate when more sampled data are available. (C) 2022 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
Keywords:
Site investigation
Machine learning (ML)
Spatial interpolation
Geotechnical distance fields (GDFs)
Tree-based models
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering cover
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
IF:
10.2
Papers:
2.6K
Citations:
1.2W

Organization

U
University of Newcastle
Scholars:
1.5W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 16
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

errShare
errSave
Prediction of rockhead using a hybrid N-XGBoost machine learning framework
err2021-12-01
err74
errOAAI
errZhu, Xing; Chu, Jian; Wang, Kangda; Wu, Shifan; Yan, Wei; Chiam, Kiefer
errShare
errSave
Interpolation of spatially varying but sparsely measured geo-data: A comparative study
err2017-12-01
err70
PREAI
errWang, Yu; Akeju, Oluwatosin Victor; Zhao, Tengyuan
errShare
errSave
3D Probabilistic Site Characterization by Sparse Bayesian Learning
err2020-12-01
err42
PREAI
errChing, Jianye; Huang, Wen-Han; Phoon, Kok-Kwang
errShare
errSave
Near horizon symmetries, emergence of Goldstone modes and thermality
err2020-06-08
err0
errOAAI
errMousumi Maitra; Debaprasad Maity; Bibhas Ranjan Majhi
errShare
errSave
researcher View more