1
Return

A randomized, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial of pradefovir mesylate versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B

delete2026-04-01
delete0
PRE
AI
K
Kong, Fei
Y
Yao, Lvfeng
L
Liu, Weidong
Y
Yu, Yunsong
Z
Zhao, Weifeng
H
Hou, Jinlin
D
Dang, Shuangsuo
Y
Yuan, Shufen
H
Hu, Guoxin
Z
Zhong, Bei
C
Chen, Hui
C
Chen, Suling
D
Dong, Xiaoping
X
Xie, Xiangping
L
Liu, Zhenguo
Z
Zhang, Zong
S
Song, Xinwen
M
Mao, Qing
J
Jiang, Yongfang
M
Meng, Chenxin
G
Ge, Fangqi
S
Su, Zhijun
M
Mao, Qianguo
B
Bai, Yichun
Y
Yu, Lei
T
Tan, Youwen
F
Fan, Huizhen
J
Jiao, Zhiyong
F
Fu, Xihua
H
Hong, Liang
X
Xu, Yuanyuan
Y
Yan, Xuebing
L
Liu, Jinfeng
G
Gao, Yufeng
G
Gao, Hainv
C
Chen, Guangxia
Q
Qu, Hongguang
C
Cui, Hesong
W
Wu, Shihong
L
Lu, Xiaobo
L
Liu, Zhihong
L
Liu, Fengjun
L
Li, Xiangjun
S
Sun, Shuilin
D
Ding, Guofeng
H
Han, Tao
W
Wang, Xiaozhong
Z
Zhao, Wenhai
X
Xiang, Mingque
C
Chen, Xuebing
H
He, Wenyan
L
Lu, Shuang
Z
Zeng, Wenting
H
Hu, Qinming
Z
Zhang, Dengke
J
Jin, Weili
W
Wang, Daidi
W
Wang, Yuan
Z
Zhang, Chi
W
Wen, Xiuhong
G
Gao, Zhongqiang
L
Lv, Leiyan
Y
Yu, Kangxin
L
Li, GuangMing
Z
Zhang, Guoqiang
W
Wu, Guicheng
N
Niu, Junqi
DOI:10.1097/HEP.0000000000001754delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Background and Aims: Pradefovir mesylate is a novel liver-targeting prodrug of adefovir developed using HepDirect technology. We report that the phase 3 trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of pradefovir versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Approach and Results: This ongoing randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority, phase 3 study was conducted at 58 sites in China. Patients with CHB were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either 45 mg daily pradefovir or 300 mg daily TDF with a matching placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients whose HBV DNA level was < 29 IU/mL at week 48. All participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug were included in efficacy and safety analyses with pre-specified renal and bone endpoints at week 96. A total of 1170 patients were screened during the study, and 908 patients received the study drug. At week 48, viral suppression (HBV DNA < 29 IU/mL) rates of pradefovir were non-inferior to TDF in HBeAg-positive [-1.8% (95% CI: -9.7 to 6.1)] and HBeAg-negative [2.6% (95% CI: -5.1 to 10.3)] patients, using a non-inferiority margin of-12%. By week 96, HBeAg-positive patients showed significantly greater HBsAg decline (>= 1 log10 IU/mL) with pradefovir (39.3% vs. 29.9%). Pradefovir demonstrated a more favorable safety profile at week 96, including significantly fewer drug-related adverse events (58.6% vs. 71.9%), improved bone/renal safety, and a lower incidence of elevated creatine phosphokinase-MB. Conclusions: Pradefovir should be a highly recommended treatment option for adult patients with CHB.
Keywords:
pradefovir mesylate
tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
hepatitis B
efficacy
safety

Journal

Hepatology cover
Hepatology
IF:
15.8
Papers:
2.0W
Citations:
7.2W

Organization

X
xuzhou medical university
Scholars:
1.5W
Papers: 7.2K
Citations: 158
G
guangzhou medical university
Scholars:
5.0K
Papers: 1.3K
Citations: 0
T
tianjin university
Scholars:
7.7W
Papers: 5.6W
Citations: 88
A
army medical university
Scholars:
3.7K
Papers: 831
Citations: 0
N
nanchang university
Scholars:
7.2K
Papers: 2.0K
Citations: 0
X
xi'an jiaotong university
Scholars:
8.9W
Papers: 6.5W
Citations: 75
Z
zhengzhou university
Scholars:
9.4K
Papers: 2.7K
Citations: 2
C
central south university
Scholars:
1.7W
Papers: 5.0K
Citations: 3
C
changzhi medical college
Scholars:
203
Papers: 90
Citations: 0
G
guizhou medical university
Scholars:
1.0W
Papers: 4.8K
Citations: 8
H
Henan Medical University
Scholars:
1.4K
Papers: 311
Citations: 0
G
GuangXi Medical University
Scholars:
2.3K
Papers: 507
Citations: 3.1K
X
Xinjiang Medical University
Scholars:
8.4K
Papers: 3.9K
Citations: 3.5K
H
Harbin Medical University
Scholars:
2.9W
Papers: 1.3W
Citations: 1.6W
S
shantou university
Scholars:
2.2K
Papers: 725
Citations: 0
C
chongqing university
Scholars:
1.0W
Papers: 3.9K
Citations: 1
S
shandong medical & pharmaceutical university
Scholars:
314
Papers: 87
Citations: 0
S
southern medical university - china
Scholars:
4.5W
Papers: 2.4W
Citations: 50
P
peking university
Scholars:
11.5W
Papers: 8.6W
Citations: 146
S
shandong university
Scholars:
9.1W
Papers: 6.3W
Citations: 94
N
north sichuan medical university
Scholars:
675
Papers: 164
Citations: 0
S
shanxi medical university
Scholars:
1.7W
Papers: 7.9K
Citations: 114
Y
yanbian university
Scholars:
980
Papers: 286
Citations: 0
J
Jilin University
Scholars:
8.4W
Papers: 5.5W
Citations: 8.9K
A
anhui medical university
Scholars:
2.9W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 248
Z
zhejiang university
Scholars:
17.0W
Papers: 11.9W
Citations: 152
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers