Return
A robust framework for secure cardiovascular risk prediction: An architectural case study of differentially private federated learning
R
L
DOI:10.1007/s12083-026-02265-z.png)
Abstract
En 中文
Accurate cardiovascular risk prediction is crucial for preventive healthcare; however, the development of robust Artificial Intelligence (AI) models is hindered by the fragmentation of clinical data across institutions due to stringent privacy regulations. This paper presents a comprehensive architectural case study validating the engineering robustness of FedCVR, a privacy-preserving Federated Learning framework applied to heterogeneous clinical networks. Rather than proposing a new theoretical optimizer, this work focuses on a systems engineering analysis to quantify the operational trade-offs of server-side adaptive optimization under utility-prioritized Differential Privacy (DP). By conducting a rigorous stress test in a high-fidelity synthetic environment that reflects the feature space and clinical context of real-world datasets (Framingham, Cleveland), we systematically evaluate the system’s resilience to statistical noise. The validation results demonstrate that integrating server-side momentum as a temporal denoiser allows the architecture to achieve a stable F1-score of 0.78 and an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.96 under the operational privacy budget ( $$\epsilon \approx 13.4$$ ), compared to a non-private baseline of F1-score 0.84. FedCVR statistically outperforms standard stateless baselines (FedAvg, FedProx) and other adaptive optimizers (FedAdagrad, FedYogi) under identical privacy constraints. Our findings confirm that server-side adaptivity is a structural prerequisite for recovering clinical utility under realistic privacy budgets, providing a validated engineering blueprint for secure multi-institutional collaboration.
Keywords:
Federated learning
Differential privacy
Cardiovascular disease
Adaptive optimization
System architecture
Synthetic data
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
2.6
Papers:
2.2K
Citations:
2.9K
