arrow
Return

A study on buffeting response analysis: Rational functions vs Stack state-space method

delete2026-02-21
delete0
PRE
AI
S
Stoyan T. Stoyanoff *
P
Pierre-Olivier Dallaire
Z
Zachary J. Taylor
DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2026.106334delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Buffeting response theory and analysis has been the basis for the derivation of design wind loads on long-span bridges for over six decades. The wind pressure fluctuations about bridge sections, e.g., over a deck or tower, result in complex load patterns and these flexible elements start to respond and move. This movement is known to modify the loads – a phenomenon referred to as self-excited forcing. These self-excited forces need to be described theoretically to accurately predict the dynamic response of a bridge to turbulent wind. The practical application to bridge design consists primarily of two fundamental explanations: a) the quasi-static, and b) the unsteady aerodynamic theories. Based on the adopted theoretical model an appropriate response solving method is applied. Aerodynamic derivatives are commonly used for estimation of self-excited loads. A shortcoming in the application of derivatives is their mixed time and frequency dependence which poses problems to both wind stability and response analysis for multi degree-of-freedom (DOF) complex structures such as long-span bridges. Even though the structural modes of vibration are inherently uncoupled, aerodynamic coupling may be present between modes. An alternative to the mixed frequency-time domain formulation is the use of rational functions. These are frequency independent functions that are continuous in time offering attractive possibilities for improved response predictions. In this study, the response predictions based on the rational function approach are compared to those obtained via aerodynamic derivatives applying the proposed Stack State-Space response analysis method. It is observed that when the fit to the aerodynamic derivatives is close then the two methods yield similar results; however, differences in response are observed as the quality of fit worsens.
Keywords:
Buffeting response
Aerodynamic derivatives
Rational functions
Stack state-space method
Long-span bridges

Journal

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics cover
Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
IF:
4.9
Papers:
5.2K
Citations:
2.2W

Organization

R
rowan williams davies and irwin inc
Scholars:
3
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

IABSE Task Group 3.1 Benchmark Results. Part 2: Numerical Analysis of a Three-Degree-of-Freedom Bridge Deck Section Based on Experimental Aerodynamics
err2019-10-15
err0
PREAI
errGiorgio Diana; Stoyan Stoyanoff; Ketil Aas-Jakobsen; Andrew Allsop; Michael Andersen; Tommaso Argentini; Miguel Cid Montoya; Santiago Hernández; José Ángel Jurado; Hiroshi Katsuchi; Igor Kavrakov; Ho-Kyung Kim; Guy Larose; Allan Larsen; Guido Morgenthal; Ole Øiseth; Simone Omarini; Daniele Rocchi; Martin Svendsen; Teng Wu
errShare
errSave
Tacoma Narrows 50 years later—wind engineering investigations for parallel bridges
err2005-03-01
err0
PREAI
errPeter A Irwin; Stoyan Stoyanoff; Jiming Xie; Mark Hunter
errShare
errSave
Comparative and sensitivity study of flutter derivatives of selected bridge deck sections, Part 1: Analysis of inter-laboratory experimental data
err2009-01-01
err110
PREAI
errSarkar, Partha P.; Caracoglia, Luca; Haan, Frederick L., Jr.; Sato, Hiroshi; Murakoshi, Jun
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
researcher View more