arrow
Return

A Tutorial on Applying the Difference-in-Differences Method to Health Data

delete2023-09-07
delete12
delete
OA
AI
S
Sarah Rothbard
J
James C. Etheridge
E
Eleanor J. Murray *
DOI:10.1007/s40471-023-00327-xdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Purpose of ReviewDifference-in-differences analyses are a useful tool for estimating group-level decisions, such as policy changes, training programs, or other non-randomized interventions, on outcomes which occur within the intervention group. However, there is little practical advice on how to apply difference-in-differences to epidemiologic and health data. Here, we provide a tutorial on applying the difference-in-differences method to health services data, targeted at epidemiologists and other biomedical researchers.Recent FindingsAs epidemiologists increasingly engage in policy discussions, familiarity with difference-in-differences will be increasingly important. However, much of the literature on difference-in-differences is limited to econometrics examples where the types of data and questions encountered may differ from health research. There remain limited resources for epidemiologists and other medical researchers to learn how to implement difference-in-differences analyses without first having to familiarize themselves with econometric terminology and concepts.SummaryThis tutorial contains synthetic data, code, and worksheets for class instruction. We provide a step-by-step description of the difference-in-differences analysis including sensitivity checks, modeling decisions, and interpretation. In addition, we supply novel guidance on modeling difference-in-differences outcomes for count or score outcomes.
Keywords:
Difference-in-differences
Causal inference
Statistical methods
Causal effect estimation

Journal

C
Current Epidemiology Reports
IF:
3.9
Papers:
265
Citations:
1.8K

Organization

H
Harvard University
Scholars:
26.5W
Papers: 22.0W
Citations: 28.7W
B
boston university
Scholars:
3.8W
Papers: 3.2W
Citations: 67