arrow
Return

About Learning Models with Multiple Query-Dependent Features

delete2013-08-05
delete24
delete
OA
AI
C
Craig Macdonald *
R
Rodrygo L. T. Santos
I
Iadh Ounis
B
Ben He
DOI:10.1145/2493175.2493176delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Several questions remain unanswered by the existing literature concerning the deployment of query-dependent features within learning to rank. In this work, we investigate three research questions in order to empirically ascertain best practices for learning-to-rank deployments. (i) Previous work in data fusion that pre-dates learning to rank showed that while different retrieval systems could be effectively combined, the combination of multiple models within the same system was not as effective. In contrast, the existing learning-to-rank datasets (e. g., LETOR), often deploy multiple weighting models as query-dependent features within a single system, raising the question as to whether such a combination is needed. (ii) Next, we investigate whether the training of weighting model parameters, traditionally required for effective retrieval, is necessary within a learning-to-rank context. (iii) Finally, we note that existing learning-to-rank datasets use weighting model features calculated on different fields (e. g., title, content, or anchor text), even though such weighting models have been criticized in the literature. Experiments addressing these three questions are conducted on Web search datasets, using various weighting models as query-dependent and typical query-independent features, which are combined using three learning-to-rank techniques. In particular, we show and explain why multiple weighting models should be deployed as features. Moreover, we unexpectedly find that training the weighting model's parameters degrades learned model's effectiveness. Finally, we show that computing a weighting model separately for each field is less effective than more theoretically-sound field-based weighting models.
Keywords:
Performance
Experimentation
Learning to rank
samples
field-based weighting models
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

ACM Transactions on Information Systems cover
ACM Transactions on Information Systems
IF:
9.1
Papers:
1.2K
Citations:
4.7K

Organization

U
university of glasgow
Scholars:
3.5W
Papers: 3.1W
Citations: 37
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Dandruff and Seborrhea
err1938-04-01
err0
errOAAI
errGeorge M. MacKee; George M. Lewis
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
An Unusual Case of Undifferentiated Carcinoma in situ With Osteoclast-like Giant Cells of the Pancreas
err2006-10-01
err0
PREAI
errKoji Tezuka; Mitsunori Yamakawa; Akira Jingu; Yushi Ikeda; Wataru Kimura
errShare
errSave
Sensory quality of upcycled legume water: Expectation vs. reality
err2023-04-12
err0
errOAAI
errLauryn Rose Hippolite; Ziqian Feng; Yanyu Zhang; Sung Je Lee; Luca Serventi
errShare
errSave
Expression profile of vesicular nucleotide transporter (VNUT, SLC17A9) in subpopulations of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons
err2014-09-01
err0
PREAI
errKentaro Nishida; Yuka Nomura; Kanako Kawamori; Yoshinori Moriyama; Kazuki Nagasawa
errShare
errSave
researcher View more