arrow
Return

Accurate and efficient data-driven psychiatric assessment using machine learning

delete2026-01-13
delete0
delete
OA
AI
K
Kseniia Konishcheva
B
Bennett L. Leventhal
M
Maki Koyama
S
Sambit Panda
J
Joshua T Vogelstein
M
Michael P. Milham
A
Ariel B. Lindner
A
Arno Klein *
DOI:10.1186/s12911-025-03329-5delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Accurate assessment of mental disorders and learning disabilities is essential for timely intervention. Machine learning and feature selection techniques have potential for improving the accuracy and efficiency of mental health assessments. However, limited research has explored the use of large transdiagnostic datasets, as well as the application of these techniques in developing quick, briefer, question-based assessments. This study applies machine learning and feature selection techniques to a large transdiagnostic dataset featuring a high number of assessment items, and to create a tool for construction of streamlined, efficient, and effective assessments from existing data. Using the Healthy Brain Network dataset (n = 4,136 at the time this study was conducted) containing over 1000 questionnaire items, a two-stage feature selection approach, with Elastic Net models, was used to identify optimal, parsimonious item subsets for assessing various disorders and symptoms, as well as custom test-based outcome measures for learning disabilities. The study then compared model performance to existing assessments through rigorous cross-validation. Machine learning models using parsimonious item subsets significantly outperformed traditional assessments (p = 0.004). Models for specific learning disorders achieved AUC values up to 0.855. Importantly, restricting analysis to non-proprietary assessment items did not significantly reduce performance. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using existing datasets to create efficient, effective assessment tools for mental disorders and learning disabilities. Our open-source, modular software architecture facilitates adaptation to diverse datasets, though external validation remains necessary before clinical implementation. The ability to achieve strong performance using only non-proprietary items supports the development of accessible assessment tools. Data-driven methods, such as machine learning and feature selection, have shown promise in improving the accuracy and efficiency of mental health assessment. Few studies have investigated these methods for the creation of learning disability assessments, and in application to transdiagnostic datasets consisting of a large number of assessments. Using the Healthy Brain Network dataset, we have built a tool for the creation of accurate and efficient machine-learning based assessments for common mental disorders and learning disabilities. The modular design of the tool ensures its easy application to other datasets, addressing a variety of clinical and research opportunities.
Keywords:
Machine learning
Mental health assessment
Psychiatry
Learning disabilities
Learning disability assessment
Feature selection
Healthy brain network study
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making cover
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
IF:
3.8
Papers:
4.4K
Citations:
1.2W

Organization

U
University of Chicago
Scholars:
1.7K
Papers: 741
Citations: 6.7W
U
Universite Paris Cite
Scholars:
8.9W
Papers: 6.3W
Citations: 604
C
Child Mind Institute
Scholars:
43
Papers: 23
Citations: 525
D
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Scholars:
1.6K
Papers: 708
Citations: 1
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Columbia Impairment Scale
err1993-01-01
err0
PREAI
errHector R. Bird; David Shaffer; Prudence Fisher; Madelyn S. Gould; Beatriz Staghezza; Jenny Y. Chen; Christina Hoven
errShare
errSave
Early identification and intervention in depressive disorders: Towards a clinical staging model
err2008-06-18
err129
PREAI
errHetrick, S. E.; Parker, A. G.; Hickie, I. B.; Purcell, R.; Yung, A. R.; McGorry, P. D.
errShare
errSave
Clinical relevance of the primary findings of the MTA: Success rates based on severity of ADHD and ODD symptoms at the end of treatment
err2001-02-01
err833
PREAI
errSwanson, JM; Kraemer, HC; Hinshaw, SP; Arnold, LE; Conners, CK; Abikoff, HB; Clevenger, W; Davies, M; Elliott, GR; Greenhill, LL; Hechtman, L; Hoza, B; Jensen, PS; March, JS; Newcorn, JH; Owens, EB; Pelham, WE; Schiller, E; Severe, JB; Simpson, S; Vitiello, B; Wells, K; Wigal, T; Wu, M
errShare
errSave
Use of machine learning to improve autism screening and diagnostic instruments: effectiveness, efficiency, and multi-instrument fusion
err2016-04-19
err105
errOAAI
errBone, Daniel; Bishop, Somer L.; Black, Matthew P.; Goodwin, Matthew S.; Lord, Catherine; Narayanan, Shrikanth S.
errShare
errSave
Learning Disabilities Screening and Evaluation Guide for Low- and Middle-Income Countries
err
IF0
err2018-04-30
err0
errOAAI
errAnne M. Hayes; Eileen Dombrowski; Allison H. Shefcyk; Jennae Bulat
errShare
errSave
Failure and Delay in Initial Treatment Contact After First Onset of Mental Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication
err2005-06-01
err0
PREAI
errPhilip S. Wang; Patricia Berglund; Mark Olfson; Harold A. Pincus; Kenneth B. Wells; Ronald C. Kessler
errShare
errSave
Predicting risk of dyslexia with an online gamified test
err2020-12-02
err0
errOAAI
errLuz Rello; Ricardo Baeza-Yates; Abdullah Ali; Jeffrey P. Bigham; Miquel Serra
errShare
errSave
researcher View more