arrow
Return

Achieving data-driven actionability by combining learning and planning

delete2018-02-07
delete2
PRE
AI
Q
Qiang Lv *
Y
Yixin Chen
Z
Zhaorong Li
L
Ling Chen
X
Xing Zhang
H
Haihua Shen *
DOI:10.1007/s11704-017-6315-2delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
A main focus of machine learning research has been improving the generalization accuracy and efficiency of prediction models. However, what emerges as missing in many applications is actionability, i.e., the ability to turn prediction results into actions. Existing effort in deriving such actionable knowledge is few and limited to simple action models while in many real applications those models are often more complex and harder to extract an optimal solution. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that achieves actionability by combining learning with planning, two core areas of AI.In particular, we propose a framework to extract actionable knowledge from random forest, one of the most widely used and best off-the-shelf classifiers. We formulate the actionability problem to a sub-optimal action planning (SOAP) problem, which is to find a plan to alter certain features of a given input so that the random forest would yield a desirable output, while minimizing the total costs of actions. Technically, the SOAP problem is formulated in the SAS+ planning formalism, and solved using a Max-SAT based approach. Our experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed approach on a personal credit dataset and other benchmarks. Our work represents a new application of automated planning on an emerging and challenging machine learning paradigm.
Keywords:
actionable knowledge extraction
machine learning
planning
random forest
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Frontiers of Computer Science cover
Frontiers of Computer Science
IF:
4.6
Papers:
1.6K
Citations:
2.8K

Organization

F
fudan university
Scholars:
11.7W
Papers: 7.7W
Citations: 121
W
washington university (wustl)
Scholars:
5.5W
Papers: 4.5W
Citations: 70
Y
Yangzhou University
Scholars:
2.8W
Papers: 1.9W
Citations: 3.3W
C
chinese academy of sciences
Scholars:
56.5W
Papers: 44.9W
Citations: 704
researcher View more organizations