.png){kind=icon}
Return
Active Preference Optimization for Sample Efficient RLHF
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1007/978-3-032-06096-9_6.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Large Language Models (LLMs) aligned using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) have shown remarkable generation abilities in numerous tasks. However, collecting high-quality human preferences creates costly bottlenecks in practical deployments, and hence, training data are often budgeted. In these scenarios, it is crucial to collect training data (e.g., contexts, a pair of generations for each context, and a preference indicating which generation is better) carefully, yet most of the existing methods sample contexts uniformly at random from a given collection. Given this, under the Bradley-Terry-Luce preference model and with a small budget of training data, we show that uniform sampling of contexts could lead to a policy (i.e., an aligned model) that suffers a constant sub-optimality gap from the optimal policy. This highlights the need for an adaptive context sampling strategy for effective alignment under a small sample budget. To address this, we reformulate RLHF within the contextual preference bandit framework, treating generations as actions, and give a nearly complete characterization of the sub-optimality gap in terms of both lower and upper bounds. First, when the action set is a d-dimensional hypercube and the number of samples is T, we show an Omega(d/root T) lower bound. Next, we propose an algorithm, Active Preference Optimization (APO), that iteratively collects preferences for the most uncertain contexts. We show that the sub-optimality gap of the policy learned via APO matches the lower bound up to a log factor and a non-linearity constant. Finally, we perform experiments on practical datasets to validate APO's efficacy over existing methods, establishing it as a sample-efficient and cost-effective solution for LLM alignment.
Journal
M
IF:
0
Papers:
26
Citations:
0
Organization
View more organizations
Cited Papers
.png){kind=icon}
ShareSaveShareSave