.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Adaptive diversity and misbelief
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1017/S0140525X09991415.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Although it makes some progress, McKay & Dennett's (M&D's) proposal is limited because (1) the argument for adaptive misbelief is not new, (2) arguments overextend the evidence provided, and (3) the alleged sufficient conditions are not as prohibitive as suggested. We offer alternative perspectives and evidence, including individual differences research, indicating that adaptive misbeliefs are likely much more widespread than implied.
Keywords:
INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
CONFIDENCE
JUDGMENT
BIASES
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
13.7
Papers:
1.6W
Citations:
1.2W
